Volusion LLC agreed to pay $4.3 million to resolve claims it failed to adequately respond to a 2019 data breach. Volusion data breach class action rebates District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division.

The Nissan headlight class action lawsuit is Rafael Suarez, et al. To receive settlement benefits, consumers had to submit a claim form by April 25, 2022.

One Top Class Actions reader received $1,200 from this settlement. Under the terms of the settlement, consumers could receive a warranty extension for future repairs and reimbursement for past repairs. Nissan agreed to a class action settlement to resolve these allegations. This allegedly caused dimmer light from low beams and other issues. consumers who purchased or leased a 2013 to 2018 Nissan Altima manufactured with halogen headlights.Īccording to the class action lawsuit, Nissan Altima halogen headlights were defective and could become delaminated. Nissan Altima owners are receiving payments from a class action settlement resolving claims that the vehicles were manufactured with defective halogen headlights. District Court for the Central District of California. The Forever 21 data breach class action lawsuit is Hameed-Bolden, et al.

In order to receive a settlement payment, consumers had to submit a valid claim form by March 21, 2022. Top Class Actions readers report receiving payments of $100 from the settlement. The class action settlement offered payments for expense reimbursement to affected consumers. Consumers argue the retailer breached its implied contract with consumers by failing to keep their payment data private.įorever 21 agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve these allegations. Plaintiffs in the data breach class action lawsuit accuse Forever 21 of failing to safeguard their sensitive payment information. The settlement benefits consumers who used a payment card to make an in-store purchase at certain at-risk Forever 21 stores. Forever 21 data breach class action rebatesįorever 21 agreed to a data breach class action settlement to resolve allegations that payment card information was stolen from its systems in 2017. District Court for the Northern District of California. The CRT antitrust class action lawsuit is In re: Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation, Case No. The deadline to submit a claim and receive payment from the class action settlement was June 30, 2016. Actual payments from the settlement ranged from $63.71 to $322.43, according to TCA readers. Under the terms of the settlement, consumers could receive an equal share of the net settlement fund based on the products purchased - estimated to be at least $25. These practices allegedly caused consumers to pay a higher price for the products in violation of federal antitrust laws. 25, 2007.Īccording to the price-fixing class action lawsuit, LG and Chunghwa conspired with other manufacturers to charge more for CRT products. The settlement benefits consumers who purchased televisions, computer monitors or other products with CRTs during various periods between March 1, 1995, and Nov.

Equifax breach settlement email